GENERAL CONCEPT OF MODERN CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. GENERAL CONCEPT OF MODERN ENGLISH LANGUAGE.. 4 1.1 Stages of Development of Linguistic typology. 4 1.2 Exploring the Evolution of the English Language: A Look Back at How English Has Changed Over Time. 10 CHAPTER II. THE CHALLENGES OF TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES IN DIVERSE HIGH SCHOOL CLASSROOMS. 16 2.1 The place of English in morphological and genetic typology of languages. 16 2.2 The specific linguistic features of the modern dialects of the English language….. 22 CONCLUSION 26 REFERENCES 27 The second period is characterized as a period of establishing the first scientific comparison of languages and this period is related to the General and Rational Grammar: Port-Royal Grammar by Arnauld A., Lancelot C.,14 (XVII c.) in Indo-European languages. Port-Royal Grammar can be considered one of the most precious contributions into development of Linguistic typology. It was developed by 2 French monks in the small abbey Port-Royal in the suburbs of Paris (published in 1660). It is the synthesis of linguistic and philosophic ideas of that time. The languages (French, Latin. Greek and ancient Jewish/ Ides) with different genealogic origin and typological structure were compared basing on the criteria and principles elaborated by Arnauld A. and Lancelot C. Comparative study of Turkic language has its own history. Divan-Lugat At-Turk by Mahmud Kashgariy is considered the most solid work on linguistic comparison of Turkic languages. Mahmud Kashgariy analyzed phonetic, grammatical and lexical units of a group of Turkic languages and defined the level of their genetic relation to each other. Further development of comparative study can be traced in appearance of glossaries and dictionaries, e.g. Turkic-Mongol-Persian dictionary-compiled in Egypt (1245), Latin-Persian Kypchak dictionary (Kumanikus Code, XII c), and other works. One of the most prominent work is the poem of Alisher Navoi "Muhokamatul ai-Lugatain" (Debate of two languages) written in 1499. Navoi compares lexical, grammatical and word building specificities of 2 genetically non-related languages: old Uzbek and Persian. Navoi reveals a number of language specificities of Uzbek which did not have direct correspondences in Persian, e.g. suffixes of reflexivity, reciprocity, causation, modality, comparativeness, etc. The third period is related to development of comparative historical linguistics, genealogical and typological classification of languages, (mid- XIX c.) Linguistic typology has been developing step by step using descriptive and comparative grammars. Thus Linguistic typology can be considered one of the most ancient but simultaneously the least developed branch of linguistics. The Comparative Historical linguistics can be considered the next step of scientific comparison. The representatives of that field elaborated a complicated system of scientific tools for precise comparison and restoring the origins of languages on phonetic, and morphological levels. At that time the classic genealogical and typological classification of the majority of known languages of the world were developed by various authors.(brothers Shleghel, Sapir, etc.).